a high quality commercial round or a hand load would preform much better. Problem #2 is the fact that most comparisons are done with Lake city mil-surp, commercial or hand loaded 5.56x45 vs mil-surp or Wolf 7.62x39. Russia designed the 5.45x39 because America went to the 5.56x45, only reason the round even exists. I could give you links to several dozen sites selling 74 kits right now. The 5.45x39 is flooding this country right now and has been in use for over 30 years now, its quite common. OK the AK/AKM may be widespread in many variants and conditions, and be used extensively in conflicts but in comparison with M16 family (that is mainly fielded by US and NATO countries) the original is what matters - i.e. It should be taken into account no matter what. The AK-74/AKS-74 is a standard-issue weapon of the Russian military, and has been for almost 40 years. The chambers you are talking about are much less common and would make no real sense to someone who wants to compare the AK-47 and the M16. I see your point but respectfully disagree with you. a fair comparison would be 5.45x39 AK-74 to the 5.56x45 M-16A* and the 7.62x39 AK-47 to the 7.62x51 M14, otherwise its just apples to oranges and can't be done. One of the largest problems here is the fact that this article compares the 7.62x39 AK-47 to the 5.56x45 M-16A*. And "model" must be translated as "модель" instead of "модел". The transliteration is "avtomat" but the translation most common used is "automat". contribs) 17:20, 22 November 2009 (UTC)Ī literal transliteration (letter for letter) of the Russian acronyn CCCP is SSSR but most sources translate it as USSR.Preceding unsigned comment added by Sturm31 ( talk I would expect the biggest online encyclopedia in the world to have editors who have basic knowledge of the Russian language if they're going to edit articles with references to it. contribs) 20:50, 22 November 2010 (UTC) The two weapons are contemporaries, and have been the basis of many comparisons in reliable sources, and have faced in other in combat by opposite sides and on the same side.Preceding unsigned comment added by Isimon123 ( talk This article is bad because it compares two different weapons from different times and has poor supporting details. 37 Topic: includes AR-15 rifles and M4s?.35 Again, looking at the source, it just talks about the stock and over the barrel gas system and is that wrong?.34 Pistol grips on rifles date back to 1840 at least.33 AVS-36 with over the barrel gas system predates StG-44 so how can the StG-44 have "introduced" the over the barrel gas system?.32 Why does the manufacturing section of M16 includes cost of M4 ?.25 This is the best AK-47 vs M16 comparison I've ever read.19 "The Germans were the first to pioneer the assault rifle concept" - this is not true!.18 Why does it seem like there were too many comparisons with different systems?.13 We simply do not have room to discuss every possible variation of the AK-47 and M16 rifles.
8 Remove erroneous original research about Federov Automat.5 If people really want this article, better quality control is needed.
0 kommentar(er)
